Updated
A fitness product's website needs to explain the offer, support publishing and guide visitors toward the right next step. Product launches, program pages and changing campaign content can make a marketing site difficult to maintain even when the application itself works well.
We help US fitness and wellness teams scope website and content work around those needs. Zing Coach is our published example: a Webflow website rebuilt in Next.js across more than 20 pages. This evidence concerns the marketing website, not development of Zing's fitness app or AI coaching system.
Start with the pages and decisions visitors need: what the product offers, who it serves, what a subscription includes and where to sign up or download. Identify which content the marketing team changes frequently and which pages need coordinated releases. A website rebuild is useful when those needs justify the change; adding Next.js alone does not establish better conversion or search performance.
The Zing Coach case records a complete Webflow-to-Next.js rebuild spanning more than 20 pages, implemented with TypeScript and Tailwind CSS. It demonstrates delivery of a multi-page website for a fitness coaching product. It does not establish app delivery, coaching-model quality, clinical validation or conversion gains. For a new engagement, the migration steps and acceptance criteria are agreed separately rather than inferred from that example.
Inventory the current pages, campaign destinations, metadata and assets before choosing a replacement. Decide who edits program descriptions and landing pages, which fields are shared, and how previews and publication should work. Record URL changes and the destinations they require. The migration plan should assign owners for forms, analytics, downloads and launch checks, including a rollback path if a critical journey fails.
For a new rebuild, choose a controlled content snapshot or a record of edits to carry into the replacement before launch. Use one program page and its shared offer text to rehearse the decision. If marketing changes that page after the first preview is approved, identify which edition must be current at cutover and who reconciles the later edit. Keep a draft, an approved preview and the public edition distinguishable. Assign draft editing, preview access and publication authority separately, even when one person holds several roles. Accept a representative late edit and the final approved page before switching the public destination. These are proposed migration and editorial checks; Zing Coach's published case establishes the website rebuild without documenting this cutover policy.
For a new fitness website release, treat the approved offer and its next step as one review item. Name the owner of the program description, price wording and signup or app-download destination. Test the approved links from desktop, iOS and Android using destinations supplied by the product team; agree a fallback when a campaign destination changes. Review one promotion that expires and one shared description used on several pages, so editors know which changes must be published together. The Zing Coach case establishes a multi-page marketing website rebuild. This campaign approval and handoff policy is a decision for your project, not an additional claim about that delivery.
Select a representative page family and a complete journey from reading the offer to the agreed destination. Review real content, mobile layouts, navigation, contact or signup handoff and editor changes before expanding the build. Keep application features, payments, account access and any health-related data outside that website scope unless they are separately assessed and agreed. Measure the agreed website behavior instead of promising a growth percentage.
For a new engagement, bring a representative program page, a current campaign URL and the destination visitors should reach. Identify who can change the content and which forms or download links must keep working. Proposed acceptance examples: an editor can update and preview the agreed page fields; a visitor can reach the correct signup or app-download destination on mobile; each changed campaign URL reaches its agreed replacement; and the launch owner can execute the documented rollback. These are checks to agree for your project, not additional claims about the Zing delivery.
Curiosive LLC is a US company; engineering is led from Ankara, Türkiye. We agree a written scope, capacity, review windows and release responsibilities before work starts. Monthly AI-accelerated development starts from $2,000. Bring the existing system, the person who owns the workflow and examples of a successful task. A bounded first increment is easier to review than a replacement of every tool at once.
Senior engineers building your product with AI coding agents: web, mobile, SaaS or browser extension, reviewed before anything ships.
AI-accelerated development, billed monthly. We confirm scope, capacity and start date in writing before checkout.
The published case covers its Webflow-to-Next.js marketing website rebuild across more than 20 pages. We do not present it as evidence of fitness app or AI coaching delivery.
Only if the current platform cannot reasonably support the agreed requirements. Bring the page inventory, publishing workflow and constraints; compare a targeted improvement with a rebuild before deciding.
A marketing website can be scoped separately from the member application. Identify every form and integration so the agreed work reflects the data it actually touches. This page makes no healthcare compliance claim.
Agree where the website hands the visitor over, who maintains that destination, and which approved offer details must stay consistent across the boundary. Test the link on the named devices and record the owner of the external step. A website click is not proof of a completed subscription; any conversion reporting needs its own agreed data source.
Current pages, campaign destinations, content owners, analytics available to the team and examples of the visitor journey. Include what must remain working at launch and which application integrations are outside the scope.
That can be an agreed requirement. Define who may edit, open a preview, approve an edition and publish it. Include a draft-only editor attempting to publish and an approved page changed before launch as proposed acceptance examples. Keep those website roles separate from member-application access. The Zing Coach reference does not establish a particular CMS permission or approval implementation.
One paragraph on what you are building, roughly when you need it, and who it is for. No brief, no form with fifteen fields.
From the engineer who would do the work, not a sales team. If we are not the right fit we say so, and where possible we point you somewhere better.
Scope, price and timeline in writing before anything is committed. You decide with the numbers in front of you.
No long contract to begin, no lock-in to our tooling, and the code is yours from the first commit.
Start a conversationA short note about the product, the timeline and who it is for is enough to start. You will hear back from the engineer who would do the work, not a sales team.
Ankara / Türkiye · Working across European and US time zones