Updated
The point of an MVP is not to build something small. It is to get the clearest possible answer with the least possible code, and the question is almost always the same one: will people use this, and will they pay for it. Start by naming the assumption, the audience and the evidence that would change your next product decision.
Curiosive helps turn that decision into a bounded release: one core flow, explicit exclusions and acceptance criteria. A first release can be web or mobile; the platform and operating requirements follow from the user task. Scope, capacity and start date are agreed in writing before checkout.
TrendinChat’s published case describes a two-week build around trending topics, topic rooms and real-time conversation. Its stack includes React, React Native, Supabase, WebSockets and Grok AI. That duration is a historical project example, not a delivery estimate for another product. Use the case to discuss which core loop belongs in a first release and what evidence you need from users.
Separate the hypothesis from features that do not help test it. Reporting, administrative tools, languages and role models can be deferred only where the actual workflow allows it. Authentication, access controls and any payment or sensitive-data requirements still need to fit the first release. Record exclusions and the risks of temporary choices instead of assuming every product can use the same shortcuts.
Write down who will try the product, which task they should complete and how the team will review the result. Functional acceptance checks establish whether the agreed flow works; they do not prove demand or willingness to pay. Decide how feedback will inform the next scope without promising a conversion rate or a successful business.
Review observed use and feedback before expanding the roadmap. Document the setup and deliberate shortcuts so another engineer can assess what should change. An MVP does not guarantee that a later rewrite will be unnecessary. Work runs as AI-accelerated development, starting from $2,000 per month, with scope agreed in writing.
Start with the task you need to improve. These pages connect a published delivery example to discovery questions for a new engagement.
For Framingham workshop teams connecting live session questions, host review and follow-up context across a real-time participant interface.
Explore the scope and discovery questions →For Schenectady cooperative teams connecting member discussion rooms to proposal editions and explicit participation rules.
Explore the scope and discovery questions →For Auburn student-club product teams connecting current membership, term-specific discussion rooms and deliberate archive access.
Explore the scope and discovery questions →For Evanston reading-community teams developing book discussion rooms with explicit book identity, reading-section boundaries and shared web and mobile context.
Explore the scope and discovery questions →For Memphis community-product teams returning a disconnected participant to the intended topic room with understandable pending-message behavior.
Explore the scope and discovery questions →For Pittsburgh community-product teams connecting topic discovery and a shared live conversation across web and mobile.
Explore the scope and discovery questions →Senior engineers building your product with AI coding agents: web, mobile, SaaS or browser extension, reviewed before anything ships.
AI-accelerated development, billed monthly. We confirm scope, capacity and start date in writing before checkout.
The assumption, core flow, integrations and acceptance criteria determine the work. Work runs as AI-accelerated development, starting from $2,000 per month, with scope agreed in writing.
We start with discovery: which assumption is being tested, which flow is in the first version and what is explicitly out. We handle technology choices, infrastructure and delivery. Product decisions we make together, so managing a technical stack never becomes your job.
We estimate after the first-release scope and dependencies are clear. TrendinChat’s published two-week build is one historical example, not a timetable for a new project. Confirm review responsibilities and acceptance criteria before agreeing a date.
That depends on the first release and what changes later. Document temporary choices, operating limits and the expected next steps. A careful starting architecture can help future work, but it cannot guarantee that every new requirement will fit without redesign.
One paragraph on what you are building, roughly when you need it, and who it is for. No brief, no form with fifteen fields.
From the engineer who would do the work, not a sales team. If we are not the right fit we say so, and where possible we point you somewhere better.
Scope, price and timeline in writing before anything is committed. You decide with the numbers in front of you.
No long contract to begin, no lock-in to our tooling, and the code is yours from the first commit.
Start a conversationA short note about the product, the timeline and who it is for is enough to start. You will hear back from the engineer who would do the work, not a sales team.
Ankara / Türkiye · Working across European and US time zones
