Updated
Most application development that gets outsourced is not greenfield. There is a running product, a customer base that notices outages, a codebase somebody else wrote, and a backlog that grew faster than the team. The hard part is not writing features. It is arriving inside a system you did not design without breaking the parts that already work.
Curiosive works on existing products as well as new builds. RateItAll’s published case describes a Nuxt rating-platform relaunch; Zing Coach’s case describes its website rebuild in Next.js. These examples establish delivered scope, not a review-volume metric or proof that the client’s application was migrated without interruption.
Agree an initial assessment of repository layout, release process, test coverage and the data or integrations affected by the intended change. Identify what evidence is available and which workflows need a representative check. Define the assessment deliverable and duration in writing; an existing application does not establish a universal one-week discovery phase.
We use your repository, your branching strategy and your review rules. No parallel island that gets merged in a lump at the end, no zip file handover. Pull requests are small enough to review, and every one is read by a senior engineer before it merges. If you have no process yet, we bring ours and hand it over documented.
Coding agents can assist scoped implementation, tests and repetitive changes. Engineers review the affected data model, permissions, integrations and release risks. Estimate against the actual codebase and acceptance criteria; AI assistance does not establish that a sprint becomes an afternoon or that a particular saving will reach the client.
Agree the cities, actual working hours and decision deadlines of the people involved. A time-zone label does not promise same-day replies or a live meeting window. Use written decisions where schedules do not overlap and define any meeting separately. The country-comparison guide includes dated illustrative New York, Los Angeles and Ankara calculations, not team-availability commitments.
The cost that surprises people is not the invoice, it is the exit. Code you cannot read, infrastructure in an account you do not control, and a deployment nobody documented. We write typed, tested code in your repository, hosting and database accounts stay in your name, and the handover document is written as we go rather than assembled in the final week.
Senior engineers building your product with AI coding agents: web, mobile, SaaS or browser extension, reviewed before anything ships.
AI-accelerated development, billed monthly. We confirm scope, capacity and start date in writing before checkout.
We can assess an existing application before agreeing delivery. Define the repository access, workflows to review, assessment output and duration in writing. The starting state and available evidence determine the work; a fixed first-week audit is not implied.
Identify affected workflows, acceptance checks, review responsibilities and rollback before changing production. Use a representative release path and monitoring appropriate to the risk. Zing Coach’s case records a website rebuild, not evidence of uninterrupted application delivery or a guaranteed zero-regression method.
You do, from the first commit. Development runs in your repository, hosting and database accounts stay under your control, and the ownership clause is agreed before work begins rather than negotiated at the end.
Work runs as AI-accelerated development, starting from $2,000 per month, with scope agreed in writing. We scope in writing with a price and a timeline before anything is committed, so you decide with numbers in front of you.
There is no long contract to begin. The code is already yours, it is already in your repository, and the handover notes are already written, so ending the engagement is an email rather than an extraction project.
One paragraph on what you are building, roughly when you need it, and who it is for. No brief, no form with fifteen fields.
From the engineer who would do the work, not a sales team. If we are not the right fit we say so, and where possible we point you somewhere better.
Scope, price and timeline in writing before anything is committed. You decide with the numbers in front of you.
No long contract to begin, no lock-in to our tooling, and the code is yours from the first commit.
Start a conversationA short note about the product, the timeline and who it is for is enough to start. You will hear back from the engineer who would do the work, not a sales team.
Ankara / Türkiye · Working across European and US time zones
