Skip to content
Phoenix, Arizona · Collaborative event software

Event Planning Software Development for Phoenix Teams

A group event has tasks, people, costs and conversations that need to stay connected. Your software should help an organizer see what remains and help each participant understand their part. We build event-planning products for Phoenix teams around that shared working plan.

Our Lizzt project is a Dutch event app rebuilt in Next.js while retaining its existing Supabase backend. It combines shared event workspaces, AI-assisted setup and a multilingual interface. Curiosive brings that delivery experience to your own scope, with AI-accelerated engineering and a long-term product partnership that continues as organizers and participants start using the release.

Concept of shared event checklists and a timeline on a laptop beside planning cards
AI-generated concept artwork for event planning; not a Lizzt product screenshot.
5+
years building for production
12
countries the work runs in
100%
of code read by a senior engineer
1 day
to hear back, from the engineer
Browse industry workflows →

Give each event a shared place to work

Start with one event your team understands well. Map its tasks, required items, costs, attendance and conversations, then decide what belongs to the event and what belongs to an individual account. Participants should reach the relevant part of the plan without reconstructing it from a chat thread. Agree who can invite people, assign work and change shared details. A representative organizer-and-participant journey makes a stronger first release than a large set of planning screens with unclear ownership.

Relevant work: Lizzt's collaborative planning rebuild

The published Lizzt case covers a Next.js, TypeScript and Tailwind CSS frontend rebuild on an existing Supabase backend. It includes account flows and event overviews, tasks, items, costs, chat, participants, attendance, notifications and settings. A guided AI flow drafts an event from a short description, and the interface supports Dutch and English. This Dutch project is a concrete reference for rebuilding everyday planning workflows while retaining the backend that already owns the data. Your backend changes and release responsibilities are assessed separately.

Keep an existing backend when it serves the product

If your current backend is working, begin with an inventory of its endpoints, roles and observed behavior. Choose a representative event and verify how the new interface reads and saves it. Identify which behaviors need parity and which are deliberate improvements. A typed data layer can make the frontend contract clearer, but the team still needs to agree how loading, errors and updates appear to users. Keeping the backend can let a rebuild concentrate on responsiveness and usability when that fits the actual requirements.

Use AI to prepare a plan people can review

An AI-assisted setup flow can help turn a short description into a draft. Decide which fields it suggests, what information it may use and how an organizer changes the result. Keep the draft and the accepted working plan distinguishable. Review ambiguous descriptions, incomplete suggestions and a failed generation alongside a straightforward example. The same principle applies to our development process: AI accelerates implementation and exploration while engineers own review, data behavior and the quality of the complete release.

Review one event with an organizer and a participant

For a new engagement, bring an approved event example, its participant roles and the existing backend contract if there is one. Proposed acceptance examples: an organizer creates the agreed workspace; a participant sees and updates only the work they may access; a task change reaches the intended event; and an interrupted save gives a clear recovery state. If AI drafts the setup, an organizer can review the draft before it becomes the working plan. These are proposed checks for your event product, not additional claims about Lizzt's historical release tests.

A product partner as the planning workflow evolves

Real events reveal which reminders are useful, where participants get stuck and which organizer tasks take too long. We work with your team on a shared backlog and small reviewed releases, keeping the interface and backend contract aligned. Monthly AI-accelerated development starts from $2,000 with scope and capacity agreed in writing. Curiosive LLC collaborates remotely with Phoenix teams through agreed review windows, with engineering led from Ankara. The relationship can continue through new event types, accessibility improvements and ongoing maintenance rather than ending at the initial launch.

Questions

The things people ask before starting.

Can you build collaborative event software for a Phoenix company?

Yes. Begin with one event example, organizer and participant roles, and the tasks they share. We can scope a complete workspace journey before expanding the product's planning features.

Can you rebuild our frontend while keeping our backend?

The Lizzt case demonstrates that approach with Next.js and an existing Supabase backend. For your product, we review the data contract, account rules and behavior that must carry forward before agreeing the rebuild.

Does the Lizzt case cover ticket sales or venue booking?

Its published scope centers on collaborative event planning and shared workspaces. Ticketing, venue inventory and payment integrations would need their own requirements and scope.

Can you stay involved after organizers begin using the app?

Yes. An ongoing monthly product partnership can cover agreed improvements and maintenance with a shared backlog, explicit capacity and reviewed releases.

How it starts

What happens after you write to us.

  1. 01

    You describe the product

    One paragraph on what you are building, roughly when you need it, and who it is for. No brief, no form with fifteen fields.

  2. 02

    You get a reply within a day

    From the engineer who would do the work, not a sales team. If we are not the right fit we say so, and where possible we point you somewhere better.

  3. 03

    You get a scoped plan

    Scope, price and timeline in writing before anything is committed. You decide with the numbers in front of you.

No long contract to begin, no lock-in to our tooling, and the code is yours from the first commit.

Start a conversation
Contact

Looking for an engineering partner for the long haul?

A short note about the product, the timeline and who it is for is enough to start. You will hear back from the engineer who would do the work, not a sales team.

Ankara / Türkiye · Working across European and US time zones